<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adam Breckler &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adambreckler.com/category/technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adambreckler.com</link>
	<description>internet professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:15:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Impact of New Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.adambreckler.com/impact-of-new-technology</link>
		<comments>http://www.adambreckler.com/impact-of-new-technology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adambreckler.com/?p=864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People seem to routinely overestimate the impact of new technologies in the short-run and under estimate the long-run impact.  As a rule of thumb, a new technologies impact will be overestimated for 3-7 years looking forward, and underestimated 7-10 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to routinely overestimate the impact of new technologies in the short-run and under estimate the long-run impact.  As a rule of thumb, a new technologies impact will be overestimated for 3-7 years looking forward, and underestimated 7-10 years out</p>
<p>There are a number of reasons for this including the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_lifecycle">Technology Adoption Life-Cycle</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law">Moore&#8217;s Law</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adambreckler.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/technology.png"><img src="http://www.adambreckler.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/technology.png" alt="technology" title="technology" width="672" height="612" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-865" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adambreckler.com/impact-of-new-technology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Years of Moore&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://www.adambreckler.com/100-years-of-moores-law</link>
		<comments>http://www.adambreckler.com/100-years-of-moores-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adambreckler.com/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Via: Paul Kedrosky Via Steve Jurvetson Via Ray Kurzweil
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-696" title="3656849977_48f6a16eb4_o_thumb" src="http://www.adambreckler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/3656849977_48f6a16eb4_o_thumb.png" alt="3656849977_48f6a16eb4_o_thumb" width="500" /></p>
<p>Via: <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2010/01/moores_law_then.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InfectiousGreed+%28Paul+Kedrosky%27s+Infectious+Greed%29">Paul Kedrosky</a> Via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/3656849977/">Steve Jurvetson</a> Via <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net">Ray Kurzweil</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adambreckler.com/100-years-of-moores-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google re-inventing the model of the Corporation?</title>
		<link>http://www.adambreckler.com/is-google-re-inventing-the-model-of-the-corporation</link>
		<comments>http://www.adambreckler.com/is-google-re-inventing-the-model-of-the-corporation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adambreckler.com/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Old Paradigm: Rely on quasi-monopoly and second-rate legacy products to squeeze users starved of choice for every last penny (*cough* Microsoft, *cough* *cough*).

The New Paradigm: Put end-users first and profits will follow. (Google).

Much can be said about the corporate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Old Paradigm:</strong> Rely on quasi-monopoly and second-rate legacy products to squeeze users starved of choice for every last penny (*cough* Microsoft, *cough* *cough*).</p>
<p><img title="microsuck" src="http://www.adambreckler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/microsuck.gif" alt="microsuck" width="351" height="81" /></p>
<p><strong>The New Paradigm:</strong> Put end-users first and profits will follow. (Google).</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-686" title="google-halo" src="http://www.adambreckler.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/google-halo.jpg" alt="google-halo" width="256" height="113" /></p>
<p>Much can be said about the corporate cultures (particularly Google&#8217;s) which have in part enabled this brand of user-centric thinking, but that is a topic for another discussion.</p>
<p>Time and time again Google has put the best interests of their users AHEAD of their own share-holders and short-term bottom line.  This isn&#8217;t to say that they are profit agnostic in the slightest, they happen to make very healthy profits, rather they believe that doing right by their customers will earn them more loyalty (read: money) in the long run.</p>
<p>To phrase it another way: Google is not successful in-spite of putting users interests first, to the contrary, they are successful BECAUSE they put users&#8217; interests first.<br />
<span id="more-679"></span><br />
Ok, so what are some examples of this seemingly &#8220;altruistic&#8221; behavior?</p>
<p><strong>Example 1</strong> (2007): Google get&#8217;s serious about ad quality by <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/02/quality-score-updates.html">implementing a &#8220;quality score&#8221; </a>for all of it&#8217;s search ads.</p>
<p><strong>Example 2</strong> (2010):  <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/05/apple-google-carriers/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29">Google&#8217;s recent entrance into the mobile phone market</a>, providing more openness and choice in a stagnant and typically user-unfriendly industry.</p>
<p>What remains to be seen is how long this type of user-centric behavior can last.  The danger is that with time, pressure to increase profit will lead to cost-cutting measures that affect their products, but in the mean-time it seems like Google and it&#8217;s management are still eating the &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; dogfood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adambreckler.com/is-google-re-inventing-the-model-of-the-corporation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology Consumption (Scale &gt; Price)</title>
		<link>http://www.adambreckler.com/technology-consumption-scale-price</link>
		<comments>http://www.adambreckler.com/technology-consumption-scale-price#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adambreckler.com/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
I&#8217;ve been wondering for awhile, how come in the face of deflationary pressures (decrease in price/performance ratio), the amount of overall $ consumed of technology continues to rise.  As it turns out the answer is actually quite obvious, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <object width="550" height="338"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/43zo82W7aPI&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1&#038;start=2470"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/43zo82W7aPI&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1&#038;start=2470" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"  width="550" height="338"></embed></object></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering for awhile, how come in the face of deflationary pressures (decrease in price/performance ratio), the amount of overall $ consumed of technology continues to rise.  As it turns out the answer is actually quite obvious, or so it is made to seem by the omniscient <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Kurzweil'>Ray Kurzweil</a> (fast forward video to time 41:12).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adambreckler.com/technology-consumption-scale-price/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impact of Exponential Growth</title>
		<link>http://www.adambreckler.com/the-impact-of-exponential-growth</link>
		<comments>http://www.adambreckler.com/the-impact-of-exponential-growth#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exponential growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kurzweil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adambreckler.com/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard not to be wildly optimistic about what the future holds when Ray Kurzweil lays it out it so matter-of-factly.
Our intuition is linear, so many scientists think in linear terms and expect that the slow pace of the past [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard not to be wildly optimistic about what the future holds when Ray Kurzweil lays it out it so matter-of-factly.</p>
<blockquote><p>Our intuition is linear, so many scientists think in linear terms and expect that the slow pace of the past will characterize the future. But the reality of progress in information technology is exponential, not linear. What used to take up a building now fits in my pocket, and what now fits in my pocket will fit inside a blood cell in 25 years. </p></blockquote>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/guest/23802/">http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/guest/23802/</a></p>
<p><span id="more-530"></span><br />
<img src="http://www.adambreckler.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/exponential_growth_520.jpg" alt="exponential_growth_520" title="exponential_growth_520" width="540"  class="alignleft size-full wp-image-531" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adambreckler.com/the-impact-of-exponential-growth/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hype Cycle</title>
		<link>http://www.adambreckler.com/the-hype-cycle</link>
		<comments>http://www.adambreckler.com/the-hype-cycle#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adambreckler.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hype cycle is a graphic representation of the maturity, adoption and business application of specific technologies. The term was coined by Gartner, an analyst/research house, based in the United States, that provides opinions, advice and data on the global [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="stopcap">A</span> hype cycle is a graphic representation of the maturity, adoption and business application of specific technologies. The term was coined by Gartner, an analyst/research house, based in the United States, that provides opinions, advice and data on the global information technology industry.</p>
<p><strong>Notice</strong> that the adjusted expectations during the plateau never quite live up to the initial inflated expectations of the peak.</p>
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Gartner_Hype_Cycle.svg/400px-Gartner_Hype_Cycle.svg.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Source:<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle">Wikipedia</a></p>
<p><span id="more-359"></span></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>&#8220;Technology Trigger&#8221;</strong> — The first phase of a hype cycle is the &#8220;technology trigger&#8221; or breakthrough, product launch or other event that generates significant press and interest.</li>
<li><strong> &#8220;Peak of Inflated Expectations&#8221;</strong> — In the next phase, a frenzy of publicity typically generates over-enthusiasm and unrealistic expectations. There may be some successful applications of a technology, but there are typically more failures.</li>
<li><strong>&#8220;Trough of Disillusionment&#8221;</strong> — Technologies enter the &#8220;trough of disillusionment&#8221; because they fail to meet expectations and quickly become unfashionable. Consequently, the press usually abandons the topic and the technology.</li>
<li><strong>&#8220;Slope of Enlightenment&#8221;</strong> — Although the press may have stopped covering the technology, some businesses continue through the &#8220;slope of enlightenment&#8221; and experiment to understand the benefits and practical application of the technology.</li>
<li><strong>&#8220;Plateau of Productivity&#8221;</strong> — A technology reaches the &#8220;plateau of productivity&#8221; as the benefits of it become widely demonstrated and accepted. The technology becomes increasingly stable and evolves in second and third generations. The final height of the plateau varies according to whether the technology is broadly applicable or benefits only a niche market.</li>
</ol>
<p>The initial hype behind clean tech hit it&#8217;s peak early last year and seems to be in the middle of a rebound or the &#8220;slope of enlightenment&#8221;.  The following chart tracks the price of the clean tech etf PZD.</p>
<p><script src="http://charts.wikinvest.com/wikinvest/wikichart/javascript/scripts.php" type="text/javascript"></script>
<div id="wikichartContainer_01BB7E7A-4129-1743-8E9B-BC2821DCB9DE">
<div style="width: 570px; text-align: center; vertical-align: center; margin-top: 82px;"><a href="http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/"><img src="http://cdn.wikinvest.com/wikinvest/images/adobe_flash_logo.gif" alt="Flash" style="border-width: 0px;"/><br/>Flash Player 9 or higher is required to view the chart<br/><strong>Click here to download Flash Player now</strong></a></div>
</div>
<p><script type="text/javascript">if (typeof(embedWikichart) != "undefined") {embedWikichart("http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf","wikichartContainer_01BB7E7A-4129-1743-8E9B-BC2821DCB9DE","570","365",{"showAnnotations":"true","ticker":"PZD","rollingDate":"5 years","liveQuote":"true"});}</script></p>
<p>The mother of all hype cycles below, as evidenced by the peak and trough of the NASDAQ composite from the last 10 years.  According to this chart, we have been in the &#8220;Plateau of Productivity for some six years now.</p>
<p><script src="http://charts.wikinvest.com/wikinvest/wikichart/javascript/scripts.php" type="text/javascript"></script>
<div id="wikichartContainer_61E91264-D0EF-1993-7DEB-BC20858E7E7A">
<div style="width: 570px; text-align: center; vertical-align: center; margin-top: 82px;"><a href="http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/"><img src="http://cdn.wikinvest.com/wikinvest/images/adobe_flash_logo.gif" alt="Flash" style="border-width: 0px;"/><br/>Flash Player 9 or higher is required to view the chart<br/><strong>Click here to download Flash Player now</strong></a></div>
</div>
<p><script type="text/javascript">if (typeof(embedWikichart) != "undefined") {embedWikichart("http://charts.wikinvest.com/WikiChartMini.swf","wikichartContainer_61E91264-D0EF-1993-7DEB-BC20858E7E7A","570","365",{"showAnnotations":"true","tickerAlias":"NASDAQ Comp Index","ticker":"COMP","rollingDate":"10 years","liveQuote":"true"});}</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adambreckler.com/the-hype-cycle/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

